Monthly Archives: November 2015

Syrians at our Southern Border

Why bother going out of the way to bring the Syrian refugees here?  They’re already making their way here via our porous southern border.  We hear Trump go on and on about how lax the security is at our southern border and although I don’t always agree with his bombastic attitude he is definitely right on this one.  It’s no secret that we basically do not have a border between us and Mexico and Mexico with do nothing to stop illegal immigrants from using their country as a transportation hub to get to America.

According to a recent post on Brietbart,

Two federal agents operating under the umbrella of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are claiming that eight Syrian illegal aliens attempted to enter Texas from Mexico in the Laredo Sector. The federal agents spoke with Breitbart Texas on the condition of anonymity, however, a local president of the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) confirmed that Laredo Border Patrol agents have been officially contacting the organization with concerns over reports from other federal agents about Syrians illegally entering the country in the Laredo Sector. The reports have caused a stir among the sector’s Border Patrol agents.

The sources claimed that eight Syrians were apprehended on Monday, November 16, 2015. According to the sources, the Syrians were in two separate “family units” and were apprehended at the Juarez Lincoln Bridge in Laredo, Texas, also known officially as Port of Entry 1.

Of course they were apprehended in two separate “family units”!  They had to be apprehended in such a manner as to continue to tug on the heartstrings of Americans that individuals crossing our southern border are just women and children looking for a better life.  How dare we even consider restricting not letting this poor huddled masses yearning to be free into our great nation.  This is the card liberals play on conservatives who actually stand for the rule of law and realize the possible threat that unfettered immigration into this country poses to every single American citizen.  Couple that with the threat faced with ISIS and the importance of screening every single individual that enters this country is compounded tenfold.

As if this more recent incident isn’t enough rewind back to September and Brietbart reported on another incident regarding Syrian migrants attempting to cross the southern border.

According to Brietbart back in September,

Officers with U.S. Customs and Border Protection arrested 27-year-old Walaa Alrehawi and her brother-in-law 46-year-old Mohammad Ziad Alzalam last week in the border city of Hidalgo.

On Monday, the two went before U.S. Magistrate Judge Dorina Ramos, who read them their rights and ordered they be held without bond pending a detention hearing later this week.
Court records obtained by Breitbart Texas revealed that Ziad travelled to Beirut, Lebanon, to pick up Alrehawi who has been identified as his sister-in-law. She allegedly used the passport belonging to Ziad’s wife to fly to Frankfurt, Germany. From there, the two flew to the Mexican resort town of Cancun. The duo eventually made their way to the Mexican city of Reynosa and subsequently tried to enter the United States through Hidalgo.

In this incident we see two individuals who attempt to use fake passports to gain entrance into the United States.  This is the same type of scenario that played out in Paris when the islamists, one of which was tied to the Syrian refugee population, who allegedly arrived in France using a fake passport.

I know many are running around crying about how ignorant it is for us to turn away anyone who may want to come here.  There are a few things that one must take into consideration though before rushing to such judgement.  Given the aforementioned events that have unfolded not only in Paris but with regards to Syrians attempting to enter the United States illegally, it is essential we remain skeptical.  Additionally, our vetting process is under great scrutiny from all levels of government including the FBI, and other law enforcement agencies. Lastly, do we really have the resources at this point to take care of upwards of 80,000 more people in this country?  We cannot even take care of our veterans and we want to import more people who will inevitably be a burden to the already overloaded welfare system.
-Young Conservative

Patriot Insight: Phil Williams Show Notes for November 20th

Patriot Insight: Phil Williams Show

Show Notes 11/20

Syrian Refugees

There will always be people attempting to come to this country and part of the reason is because we do have values we refer to as American values and a rule of law unlike many other countries around the world. Just look at what is going on in Europe, they have succumb to political correctness and acceptance of everyone and they are simply becoming one giant landmass. Different countries used to have varying cultures and values, yet with the rampant catering to Islamic beliefs to avoid offending them many countries are losing their identity. Just look at the no go zones found found throughout Europe.

On January 11, Emerson said they “exist throughout Europe. . . . They’re places where the governments — like France, Britain, Sweden, Germany — don’t exercise any sovereignty. . . . You basically have zones where sharia courts were set up, where Muslim density is very intense, where the police don’t go in, and where it’s basically a separate country almost, a country within a country.”

Although Emerson, whom I admire for his moral courage and investigative skills, immediately apologized for his “terrible error” of saying that cities such as Birmingham, England, “are totally Muslim where non-Muslims just simply don’t go,” he did not address the larger question of whether no-go zones, in fact, do “exist throughout Europe” and are places where governments “don’t exercise any sovereignty.”

If you ask me what is really at the heart of the matter with regards to the Syrian Refugees is the fact that many liberals hate what America stands for.  They constantly speak about “fundamental transformation” and we are finally getting a true glimpse into what that fundamental transformation includes.  Obama and his cronies are determined to put us on a level playing field with the rest of the world.  No longer is America exceptional, no longer is America the shining beacon on the hill, we are now becoming no better than the countries in Europe being overrun by radical islamic extremists.

What are refugees getting when they come here, who’s paying for it?

These downtrodden refugees, you know the women and children that Obama keeps lecturing us about, even though the videos and pictures we see show predominantly men streaming across the borders into Europe, don’t really appear to be hurting all that bad.  Many have cell phones, nice clothes, and the like.

Let’s get at one of the real reasons these individuals want to come here so badly.  They know damn well what will be offered them once they arrive. Just like the illegal aliens streaming across the border know, these so called refugees know that once they get here they will be place at the front of the line before anyone else waiting for government assistance, namely the Veterans. We have thousands of Veterans waiting for care at VA hospitals, veterans waiting for all types of assistance yet we are concerning ourselves with bringing into the country upwards of 100,000 more people who will simple leech off of the system.  

According to a November 17th Associated Press piece,

Currently 70,000 refugees from around the world are allowed to come to the United States. The U.S. will accept 85,000 people in 2016 and 100,000 in 2017. People fleeing Syria will account for much of the increase, though not all.

Although more than half of U.S. governors have objected to plans to resettle Syrian refugees in the United States, with some declaring that they won’t allow resettlement in their states, the federal government controls resettlement programs. State authorities have no legal authority to bar refugees from moving to their jurisdictions.
Upon arrival in the United States, each refugee is eligible for a $1,975 arrival and placement grant that is managed by one of nine refugee resettlement agencies working with the federal government. At least $1,125 of that grant must be spent on housing, including a bed for each person, basic furniture such as a couch, kitchen items including dishes and silverware, and weather-appropriate clothing. The remainder is used to cover additional costs for the aid agency.

Low-income refugee families with children may be eligible for temporary assistance for needy families, a welfare program in which state rules govern eligibility and the amount of money families receive, for up to five years. Immigrants without children or otherwise not eligible for the temporary assistance program qualify for the refugee cash assistance program run by the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement. Eligibility for that program lasts eight months.

Low-income refugees may be eligible for Medicaid for up to seven years. While immigrants to the U.S. are not generally eligible for Medicaid, refugees invited to move to the U.S. are exempt. Each state determines which refugees meet the eligibility requirements. Those who don’t qualify for Medicaid can receive refugee medical assistance for up to eight months.
Refugees must register with the Social Security Administration after arrival and are almost immediately eligible for a work permit. Social services, including job placement programs, are available to refugees for up to five years.
Low-income refugees may also be eligible for food-assistance programs.

Cloward Piven overwhelming the system

According to Wikipedia,

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty”

The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.

“Conservative Republicans are always ready to declaim the evils of public welfare, and they would probably be the first to raise a hue and cry. But deeper and politically more telling conflicts would take place within the Democratic coalition…Whites – both working class ethnic groups and many in the middle class – would be aroused against the ghetto poor, while liberal groups, which until recently have been comforted by the notion that the poor are few… would probably support the movement. Group conflict, spelling political crisis for the local party apparatus, would thus become acute as welfare rolls mounted and the strains on local budgets became more severe.

One would literally have to be blind to not see this coming at this point.  The liberal elite are getting fed up with you and me as we wise up to what is going on and they must do whatever they can to silence us, even if it means to manufacture a crisis.  Just think of what they would do with the perfectly implemented manufactured crisis.  Not only could they take over the economy, they could implement martial law, restrict movement of people about the country, and practically run our lives on a day to day basis.

-Young Conservative

Veterans Starve While Obama Welcomes Syrian Refugees

I get it that everyone has become polarized with regards to the entire Syrian Refugee “crisis”. I myself tend to jump at things like this as I always take a stern stance on many of the trending topics of the day.  While some may say others are ignorant because we don’t necessarily condone throwing open the doors to ever Syrian Refugee, others say we should shut the door entirely.

 I feel that we should look inwardly and say to ourselves first off we are not “racist” if we question whether or not to bring these people in given the current state of affairs in the world today.  We should question things like this, and given the governments ability to thoroughly vet incoming immigrants there is plenty of reason to be skeptical with regards to the vetting process to screen the Syrian Refugees to ensure we do not have an attack here like we witnessed in Paris.

We should also say to ourselves… Will these “refugees” be living here permanently or will they return home when the crisis ends.  A refugee by definition is someone who will eventually return to their homeland once said conflict has been resolved.  If these individuals do end up here permanently will they find work or will they just add to the roughly 93,000,000 Americans currently out of the workforce and in turn increase the burden placed on the roughly 80 means tested forms of government assistance?

We also have a true crisis within the United States with regards to the Veterans Affairs system.  We have an ever growing population of homeless veterans, veterans waiting months if not years to receive the proper medical treatment.  While this is going on we are seriously considering bringing in tens of thousands of refugees along with however many illegal aliens that continue to stream across the southern border?

So before we start fighting among ourselves calling each other racist, xenophobes, bigots, ignorant and many other names, lets look at this from a broad perspective and realize that we have more pressing issues to deal with here at home before we should even consider catering to any large group of incoming refugees.

-Young Conservative

Black Lives Matter Invades Dartmouth Library Harassing Students

As we sit here on the precipice of what some are calling the beginning of WWIII we see the pathetic pukes at #BlackLivesMatter continuing their tirade on college campuses throughout the country.  Just when you thought the entire “movement” was dying off, they sprung to life over the hunger strike carried out by Missouri student Johnathan Butler.  The most ironic part of the entire “hunger strike” incident is the fact that he comes from a more privileged family than just about anyone I know.  They rant and rave about “white privilege” yet his father made roughly $8 million last year alone.  Additionally, the alleged spark that reignited the black lives matter movement we are seeing right now was a swastika smeared on a bathroom wall made of feces which by the way should offend the Jewish people not black lives matter.
As the so called movement moves from college campus to college campus we see these THUGS (yes I called them thugs as they are emulating thug behavior) attempt to intimidate anyone who will not align with whatever it is they stand for.

A video has surfaced that shows these morons in action as they entered a library on the campus of Dartmouth University. What follows is utterly disgusting!

As posted on The Blaze,
The bi-weekly newspaper entitled the Dartmouth Review described the “protest”…
Black-clad protesters gathered in front of Dartmouth Hall, forming a crowd roughly one hundred fifty strong.  Ostensibly there to denounce the removal of shirts from a display in Collis, the Black Lives Matter collective began to sing songs and chant their eponymous catchphrase. Not content to merely demonstrate there for the night, the band descended from their high-water mark to march into Baker-Berry Library.
“F*** you, you filthy white f***s!” “F*** you and your comfort!” “F*** you, you racist s***!”
Throngs of protesters converged around fellow students who had not joined in their long march. They confronted students who bore “symbols of oppression”: “gangster hats” and Beats-brand headphones.  The flood of demonstrators self-consciously overstepped every boundary, opening the doors of study spaces with students reviewing for exams. Those who tried to close their doors were harassed further. One student abandoned the study room and ran out of the library. The protesters followed her out of the library, shouting obscenities the whole way.
Students who refused to listen to or join their outbursts were shouted down.  “Stand the f*** up!”  “You filthy racist white piece of s***!”  Men and women alike were pushed and shoved by the group.  “If we can’t have it, shut it down!” they cried.  Another woman was pinned to a wall by protesters who unleashed their insults, shouting “filthy white b****!” in her face.
After seeing the events carried out by the scum known as black lives matter one must ask, what ever happened to “safe space”.  All we heard last week from the little snowflakes at Missouri was how their safe space was being invaded any time they encountered a situation in which they felt unconformable. I guess safe space is only allotted to those of a specific race.  It’s truly ironic just how hypocritical these individuals are.  They stand for safe space while invading the space of others! They complain about the Constitution and how it is infringing on their rights while exercising their Constitutional right to protest.  
– Young Conservative

Blackavists at Mizzou Complain Paris Attacks Takes Spotlight Off of Them

Anyone who knows the true mentality of the individuals we are dealing with at the University of Missouri knows would not be surprised by the fact that the little whiny brats are upset that the horrific attacks by ISIS in Paris have taken the spotlight off of their made up cause for protesting.

First lets get one thing straight, these individuals are protesting over a supposed swastika made of poop found in one of the campus bathrooms.  Additionally, there have been complaints of racial slurs being spoken against those of color on campus.  These claims too have been completely unsubstantiated as not one formal police report has been filed regarding any such incident. Not to mention the fact that we do still have a freedom of speech in this country therefore you may not like what people have to say, and those words may encroach on your personal space, but guess what suck it up and deal with it.  We all hear things we don’t like from time to time and what do we do?  We deal with it like adults.

For most of last week we had the “luxury” of hearing these little brats in Missouri whine about their safe space being violated and they the attacks in Paris occur and we all see what is really important in the world today, stopping radical Islamic terrorism.  I’m sorry but your made up social cause at Missouri and at campuses around the country pales in comparison to what we face with ISIS.  Do you think for one second if ISIS were to come to a campus near you they would give a crap about your personal space or your right to protest for that matter?  NO!!  If they didn’t agree with you they would do more than invade your personal space, they would freaking kill you!

First of all there were no black students on the campus of Missouri “trapped in their rooms” and if there actually were kids trapped in their rooms due to any type of threat, we would all be made well aware of the situation.  With social media today I’m sure there would be documented proof of the entire situation.  So until I actually see this proof I don’t want to hear about kids trapped in their rooms over made up scenarios.  Grow a pair, come out of your room and if people invade your social space get over it and move on!

As part of the misguided outrage at the media’s concentration on the Paris attacks the black lives matter idiots went as far as to start a Twitter hashtag entitle “#fuckParis”.  While this is the case it didn’t take long for those who possessed love for their common man quickly took down those who would cry about and complain that the tragedy in Paris took the spotlight from the protests in Missouri.  Protests that clearly were a result of something no one has yet been able to provide substantial proof as to why it occurred in the first place.



-Young Conservative

Islamist Sympathizers Take the Stage with #MuslimsAreNotTerrorists

One could merely bet it would only be a matter of time before individuals would come out of the woodwork to ensure that we do not blame “Muslims” for the attacks that took place in Paris.  I don’t think anyone is blaming Muslims as a whole but we must confront the radical Islamist problem that is growing and growing. Even our own president cannot call ISIS Islamic and until we can attribute the radical view of Islam these terrorists posses, we will not even begin to be able to defeat them.

It only took less than 24 hours before the hashtag “MuslimsAreNotTerrorist” went trending on Twitter as people took to social media to rant about the possibility of tying Muslims to the horrid tragedy in France.

Actually the terrorists were muslim and they possessed a literal view of the Quran.  If people actually read this document they would understand what we are dealing with and how to defeat!

Someone should tell ISIS they must come together and love.  Oh wait ISIS clearly has no intentions to love anyone as they put on display yesterday evening. I agree we must call for love be we must also be able to call evil when we see it.

 One can agree that various religions throughout history have done bad things.  Just as our president was so quick to speak about when he talked about the Christian crusades. The fact of the matter is that the only religion in the world today carrying out these types of attacks is ISLAM!  The quicker we can all realize that the quicker we can take a stand to stop the carnage.

 I’m sick of hearing that islam is a religion of peace!!

Precisely! We must all understand the Quran if taken literally promotes sharia law and the killing of all unbelievers. Wake up people, IT IS ABOUT ISLAM!!

– Young Conservative

Actor Michael Ian Black Mocks France Shooting

It takes a special kind of low life scum to politicize something like the horrid attack we are seeing unfold right now in France.  When you want to find special low life scum you typically need to look no further than Hollywood as so many love to try and use terror attacks to play on our laws and freedoms here in America.  

One freedom that lies at the heart of what makes us great is the right we have to bear arms. This right is something that we all must utilize to keep us safe.  It is quite clear that Mr. Black would love to see that right done away with.  I must ask him one question, if he advocates eliminating our second amendment right will he then do away with any type of security he may travel with?  I love seeing those who sit behind the silver curtain far away from any real danger preach to us how we are supposed to live our lives!

– Young Conservative